Quantcast
Channel: SCN: Message List
Viewing all 8379 articles
Browse latest View live

잠실출장안마※O1Oㅡ3252ㅡ6322※24시간 서울경기전지역 출장마사지 100%후불제 20대관리사

$
0
0

잠실출장안마※O1Oㅡ3252ㅡ6322※24시간 서울경기전지역 출장마사지 100%후불제 20대관리사 잠실출장안마※O1Oㅡ3252ㅡ6322※24시간 서울경기전지역 출장마사지 100%후불제 20대관리사 잠실출장안마※O1Oㅡ3252ㅡ6322※24시간 서울경기전지역 출장마사지 100%후불제 20대관리사 잠실출장안마※O1Oㅡ3252ㅡ6322※24시간 서울경기전지역 출장마사지 100%후불제 20대관리사 잠실출장안마※O1Oㅡ3252ㅡ6322※24시간 서울경기전지역 출장마사지 100%후불제 20대관리사 잠실출장안마※O1Oㅡ3252ㅡ6322※24시간 서울경기전지역 출장마사지 100%후불제 20대관리사 잠실출장안마※O1Oㅡ3252ㅡ6322※24시간 서울경기전지역 출장마사지 100%후불제 20대관리사 잠실출장안마※O1Oㅡ3252ㅡ6322※24시간 서울경기전지역 출장마사지 100%후불제 20대관리사 잠실출장안마※O1Oㅡ3252ㅡ6322※24시간 서울경기전지역 출장마사지 100%후불제 20대관리사 잠실출장안마※O1Oㅡ3252ㅡ6322※24시간 서울경기전지역 출장마사지 100%후불제 20대관리사 잠실출장안마※O1Oㅡ3252ㅡ6322※24시간 서울경기전지역 출장마사지 100%후불제 20대관리사 잠실출장안마※O1Oㅡ3252ㅡ6322※24시간 서울경기전지역 출장마사지 100%후불제 20대관리사 잠실출장안마※O1Oㅡ3252ㅡ6322※24시간 서울경기전지역 출장마사지 100%후불제 20대관리사 잠실출장안마※O1Oㅡ3252ㅡ6322※24시간 서울경기전지역 출장마사지 100%후불제 20대관리사 잠실출장안마※O1Oㅡ3252ㅡ6322※24시간 서울경기전지역 출장마사지 100%후불제 20대관리사 잠실출장안마※O1Oㅡ3252ㅡ6322※24시간 서울경기전지역 출장마사지 100%후불제 20대관리사 잠실출장안마※O1Oㅡ3252ㅡ6322※24시간 서울경기전지역 출장마사지 100%후불제 20대관리사 잠실출장안마※O1Oㅡ3252ㅡ6322※24시간 서울경기전지역 출장마사지 100%후불제 20대관리사 잠실출장안마※O1Oㅡ3252ㅡ6322※24시간 서울경기전지역 출장마사지 100%후불제 20대관리사 잠실출장안마※O1Oㅡ3252ㅡ6322※24시간 서울경기전지역 출장마사지 100%후불제 20대관리사 잠실출장안마※O1Oㅡ3252ㅡ6322※24시간 서울경기전지역 출장마사지 100%후불제 20대관리사 잠실출장안마※O1Oㅡ3252ㅡ6322※24시간 서울경기전지역 출장마사지 100%후불제 20대관리사 잠실출장안마※O1Oㅡ3252ㅡ6322※24시간 서울경기전지역 출장마사지 100%후불제 20대관리사 잠실출장안마※O1Oㅡ3252ㅡ6322※24시간 서울경기전지역 출장마사지 100%후불제 20대관리사 잠실출장안마※O1Oㅡ3252ㅡ6322※24시간 서울경기전지역 출장마사지 100%후불제 20대관리사 잠실출장안마※O1Oㅡ3252ㅡ6322※24시간 서울경기전지역 출장마사지 100%후불제 20대관리사 잠실출장안마※O1Oㅡ3252ㅡ6322※24시간 서울경기전지역 출장마사지 100%후불제 20대관리사 잠실출장안마※O1Oㅡ3252ㅡ6322※24시간 서울경기전지역 출장마사지 100%후불제 20대관리사 잠실출장안마※O1Oㅡ3252ㅡ6322※24시간 서울경기전지역 출장마사지 100%후불제 20대관리사 잠실출장안마※O1Oㅡ3252ㅡ6322※24시간 서울경기전지역 출장마사지 100%후불제 20대관리사 잠실출장안마※O1Oㅡ3252ㅡ6322※24시간 서울경기전지역 출장마사지 100%후불제 20대관리사 잠실출장안마※O1Oㅡ3252ㅡ6322※24시간 서울경기전지역 출장마사지 100%후불제 20대관리사 잠실출장안마※O1Oㅡ3252ㅡ6322※24시간 서울경기전지역 출장마사지 100%후불제 20대관리사 잠실출장안마※O1Oㅡ3252ㅡ6322※24시간 서울경기전지역 출장마사지 100%후불제 20대관리사 잠실출장안마※O1Oㅡ3252ㅡ6322※24시간 서울경기전지역 출장마사지 100%후불제 20대관리사 잠실출장안마※O1Oㅡ3252ㅡ6322※24시간 서울경기전지역 출장마사지 100%후불제 20대관리사 잠실출장안마※O1Oㅡ3252ㅡ6322※24시간 서울경기전지역 출장마사지 100%후불제 20대관리사


Asssessment / Indirect allocation

$
0
0

Hello All

 

Would like to know how to setup KSu5 or KSc5 for below scenario.

 

Sending  Cost center   Amount posted GL

 

CTR 1                      GL-1 - $100

 

CTR 2                       GL-2 - $200

 

Receiving Cost center - CTR3, and SKF posted say 100 and Activity maintained rate - $10

 

Now i want to set allocation in such a way, where the allocation amount based SKF and Activity Rate 1000 ( 100 * 10) should be sent on the basis of 1:2 from cost center 1 and 2 means CTR 1 should get credited for 333 and CTR 2 should get credited for 667 and CTR 3 should get 1000$ alllocated.

 

In simple based on sending cost center posted value.

Re: Looking for US Payroll Useful Docs & Links

$
0
0

Hello Ameet,

I am not able to open the link you have provided. Can you please send me the document to my email id as well.

 

Email id: jaggasmile8@gmail.com

 

Thanks!

Re: 627 - Rejeição: O valor do ICMS desonerado deve ser informado

$
0
0

Ola Gizela boa tarde,

 

Você teve algum retorno do OSS da SAP? tenho um cenário de venda de zona franca, na versão 2.00 o valor do ICMS desonerado era enviado na tag <vDesc> tando do header quanto do item, agora com a versão 3.10 temos a tag própria <vICMSDeson> para informar o valor da desoneração.

 

Foi feito o mapeamento desta tag via BADI, porem agora esta sendo enviado o mesmo valor nas duas tags a <vDesc> e <vICMSDeson>, neste caso me retorna o erro 610 "Rejeição: Total da NF difere do somatório dos valores compõe o valor total da NF".

 

Como você diz acima, na tag <vDesc> agora na versão 3.10 só devemos enviar o valor dos descontos comerciais, que neste meu exemplo não ha desconto, portanto a tag deveria ser enviada em branco, mas no meu caso ainda esta enviando o valor do ICMS desonerado.

 

Estou na versão 604, tem alguma ideia do que pode ser?

 

Obrigado,

 

Alessandro Ávila

Re: Maintenance Order 'Plan cost' value to WBS in CJI5

$
0
0

Please check OPSV settings for category 30.  Try raising both flags (read F1 info for each of them).

Re: 2 cost objects while entering FB60

$
0
0

Hello,

 

1. Tell the user - do not enter this cost center

 

ok users often do not listen.....

 

2. set validation date of cost center expired.

    Only helps when user has no rights to change validation date

    sometimes user have constructive ways just handling "the same procedure as every year"

 

 

3. Make validation rule

    that user NN is not allowed entering cost object NN when posting vendor invoices with

    TCd. FB60

 

  .

    validation will only help when user has no access changing validation rule

 

 

Hope I was helpful

 

br erwin

Re: How to change the back ground color of header in agentry transaction screen

$
0
0

Please try testing with the latest Android client 7.0.6 to see if the problem is still there.  You may need to log a ticket with support as this may be a client issue.

 

Bill

Re: System Copy for ERP 6.0 EHP 6 No Unicode

$
0
0

Hi,

 

 

Please read the system copy guide for your product.

If your using ABAP only then you can try DB specific method as per the system copy guide, if you use ABAP+JAVA then you will have to go with DB independent method as per the system copy guide.

Also as mentioned above by Yves Non-UNICODE installation is out of support for a while, you will have to read some notes related to system copy also the system copy guide to get more information.

 

Thanks.

 

Regards,

Brindavan.M


Re: Invalid character issue when running a script...

$
0
0

My bad. Can you try

CAST({$LDA_START_DATETIME2} as datetime)

Also, what datatype is column LDA_DATE?

Re: How to configure IDOC Tunneling with IDOC_AAE ?

Re: Item Cost Query FIFO

$
0
0

Hi,

     Try the below query

 

SELECT distinct T0.[ItemCode], sum(T0.[OpenQty]) as "Open Quantity", sum(T0.[TransValue]) as "Total Transaction Value"

,case when T0.OpenQty='0' then 0 else sum(T0.TransValue)/sum(T0.OpenQty) end Calculated_Amt

 

from OINM T0

 

 


group by T0.[ItemCode], T0.[OpenQty], T0.[TransValue]

order by t0.ItemCode

 

--Manish

Error in TS40007947 step of WS40000014

$
0
0

Hi all,

 

We have implemented a process-controlled workflow for Shopping Cart (BUS2121) on SRM 7.0.

 

When a SC is rejected TS40007947 step of workflow template WS40000014 is ending with error no. WL050.

 

Work item 000000122868: Object /SAPSRM/CL_WF_PROCESS_MGR_SBWF method FINISH_PROCESS cannot be executed.

 

I debugged method HANDLE_PROCESS_FINISHED in /SAPSRM/CL_WF_PDO_CTR  and I got the exception  /sapsrm/cx_pdo_abort.

 

Any idea why is this happening?

Re: navigate to the Standard SAP transaction from Web dynpro Application

$
0
0

But then what is the use of building WD application . WD application purpose is to avoid execution of R/3 screens . Now tell us what is you functional requirement .what is WD application functionality and which Tcode you are trying to call.

Re: Disable X.509 Certificate Selection when opening a SSO enabled Solman Website

$
0
0

Hi,

 

I guess you already tried this.Have you tried with other browsers? It looks more like browser issue to me.

 

Cheers

Re: Optimization Package Failure

$
0
0

Hi Barry,

 

Search your 3 fact tables of your finance application/model where CONTRACT = 'ASCENSIONWI'

 

See Note 1433296 - BPC: Receiving errors when processing OLAP - "The attribute key cannot be found" for futher info:

https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1433296

 

Thanks,


Re: Analysis for office performace is slow than BEx analyzer

$
0
0

Hi Tammy,

 

Thanks for response.

 

We are on SP10

 

Thanks

John

Re: SAPLPD has stopped working

$
0
0

It's probably a rhetorical question but I'll ask anyway...

If SAP is no longer supporting SAPLPD then why are they distributing an updated version...?

The version information for the executable is clearly 7.40, ask you can see in the event log entry from my failure (below) ...

 

 

Faulting application name: SAPlpd.exe, version: 7400.1.0.32, time stamp: 0x541f5aa6

Faulting module name: mfc110.dll, version: 11.0.60610.1, time stamp: 0x51b50f06

Exception code: 0xc0000005

Fault offset: 0x000544eb

Faulting process id: 0x1a74

Faulting application start time: 0x01d03ccb8aa04fa3

Faulting application path: C:\Program Files (x86)\SAP\FrontEnd\SAPgui\SAPlpd\SAPlpd.exe

Faulting module path: C:\windows\SYSTEM32\mfc110.dll

Report Id: db0a8e62-a8be-11e4-befc-c0ddb927f9e8

Faulting package full name:

Faulting package-relative application ID:

 

Note that the failure point is in the SAP Supplied, Microsoft-authored "mfc110.dll" module.

 

I applaud the resourcefulness of this group, and hacking a piece of the 7.30 distro onto the 7.40 install will most likely work but that's not a long-term solution.

 

Has anyone gotten a response from SAP on this error?

Schedule Line Invalid Timestamp

$
0
0

Hi

we are running BOP in APO System.we are facing issue"Schedule line Invalid timestamp" for some Sales orders in SMQ2 Inbound Queue of APO.

Please let us know how to correct it

 

Thanks

Sunil M

Re: Personas 2.0: How to merge tabs whose contents depend each other(IW21)?

$
0
0

The reason for the hidden tab to show up are the required fields and thereby the enforced processing sequence in filling out the tab strip fields.

If you check the tab caching indicator upon entering the screen, it's going to be red, then turning green once you entered the required fields in the Notification tab. So essentially tab caching fails first which results in the unwanted rendering of the tab strip.

I'm afraid there is nothing you can do about changing this behavior. Required fields are often the cause for tab merging issues. You'd have to get rid of the required fields (make them optional) in order to fix the problem.

Issue doing availability check in APO for GATP

$
0
0

Hi,

 

We are trying to do an ATP check from ECC to APO. We have a custom BAPI (Function module) in which BAPI BAPI_MATERIAL_AVAILABILITY used for this purpose (this inturn calls BAPI_APOATP_CHECK).  We are passing plant, material, unit and check rule as inputs.  The output is  the Available Quantity. In our case, we are getting the correct available quantity for Non-GATP materials. But, for GATP materials, we are getting the available quantity as Zero. Could you please  let us know if any other paramaters need to be passed while doing ATP for  GATP materials ( GATP config in ECC and SCM)? Also, is there any alternative way to achieve this?

 

 

Thanks in advance.

 

Regards,

Pavan

 

Viewing all 8379 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>